Title: Spamhaus.org no longer lists Austrian Registry on its Block List
Author: Alex Kirk
Published: June 19, 2007
Last modified: June 21, 2007

---

# Spamhaus.org no longer lists Austrian Registry on its Block List

June 19, 2007

It has come to my attention today that the [almost famous](http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060915-7757.html)
Spam Block List provider put the IP addresses of the Austrian Registry [nic.at](http://nic.at/)
on their [block list](http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL55625).

The list that Spamhaus provides is actually something good: it allows mail server
administrators to automatically block mails arriving from servers that are known
to be operated by phishers.

At this point Spamhaus took the wrong term, though. They demanded from the Austrian
Registry to delete 15 domains that they consider to be used by phishers, apparently
without providing (enough) evidence to nic.at. So nic.at responded that — because
of Austrian law — they cannot just delete domains without proof of bogus WHOIS addresses.

I cannot judge who is ultimately right in this dispute (like did Spamhaus provide
enough evidence or not), but I can definitely judge that Spamhaus took the wrong
decision when they started to block the [IP addresses of nic.at in their list](http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL55625).

Welcome to the Kindergarten, guys.

nic.at is bound to Austrian law, and as a foreign company you can’t just come along
and ask them to remove certain domains. What if someone would go to your registry
and request deletion of spamhaus.org without providing any legitimate reason.

Dear Spamhaus, you need to stick to your policy. Your block list is about phishers,
and nic.at did not send out any phishing mails. You can’t just put someone on there
because you want to pressure them.

As a result, mail server administrators should no longer rely on block lists of 
such a provider who misuses his own list for trying to put other companies/organizations
under pressure. So this is the right moment to remove sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org from 
your server configuration.

Coverage on the German [Heise.de](http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/91417).

**Update 2007-06-20**: They have stopped listing nic.at. Finally they see reason.(
They have changed the IP address block to 193.170.120.0/32 which matches no addresses);
also see german [futurezone](http://futurezone.orf.at/it/stories/201402/).

nic.at, spamhaus, sbl

[Misc](https://alex.kirk.at/category/misc/), [Web](https://alex.kirk.at/category/web/)

Read this next

[Subversion: The Magic of Merging](https://alex.kirk.at/2006/10/12/subversion-the-magic-of-merging-2/)

## One response to “Spamhaus.org no longer lists Austrian Registry on its Block List”

 1. ![Alexander Kirk Avatar](https://alex.kirk.at/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/06/
    cropped-2025.Alex-512x512-1-48x48.jpg)
 2. [Alexander Kirk](http://alex.kirk.at/)
 3. [June 21, 2007](https://alex.kirk.at/2007/06/19/spamhausorg-lists-austrian-registry-on-its-block-list/comment-page-1/#comment-68564)
 4. You might have missed that I have updated the posting this morning already. Still
    my point is, that Spamhaus should not misuse its own tool in order to try to pressure
    another service that did not send spam or phishing e-mails.
 5. Nic.at is required by Austrian law to verify wrong entries before they can delete
    domains. Spamhaus did not provide proof of that. End of story.
 6. [Log in to Reply](https://alex.kirk.at/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Falex.kirk.at%2F2007%2F06%2F19%2Fspamhausorg-lists-austrian-registry-on-its-block-list%2F)

### Leave a Reply 󠀁[Cancel reply](https://alex.kirk.at/2007/06/19/spamhausorg-lists-austrian-registry-on-its-block-list/comment-page-1/?output_format=md#respond)󠁿

Only people in [my network](https://alex.kirk.at/friends/) can comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. [Learn how your comment data is processed.](https://akismet.com/privacy/)